Obama’s Ads Too ‘Black’
The Obama campaign began amidst a flurry of doubt from African Americans, the biggest question allegedly being “is he ‘black’ enough?” Most dismissed the question as offensive, citing the fact that a group of people shouldn’t be expected to adhere to a particular set of behaviors, especially if those behaviors are stereotypes.
But is stereotyping black people OK if Obama does it?
The Obama campaign has promoted its populist message from the very beginning, using a series of ads a little different than typical political ads. In them, a casual and tieless Obama, usually with shirt sleeves rolled up, speaks to a small group of voters on the issue du jour. The message being, Obama is accessible and cares about the little guy. In some cases these ads have no music, but in most cases there is a minimalist instrumental score outlining his hopeful message.
It’s the type of music you’d expect to hear in a film about a rag tag group of disabled war veterans taking on the New York Yankees in a baseball game that could win them enough money to pay for the mayor’s wife’s heart operation she will die without having. That is to say, the music is a bit sappy in its unflinching attempt to be ‘hopeful’. Here is an example of one such ad that played in New Hampshire:
The Iowa and New Hampshire ads were all very similar in their adherence to this style. But when it came time to advertise in South Carolina, where half of the electorate is Black, there was one not so subtle difference.
For a reason far beyond my comprehension, there exists a very ‘present’ R&B styled riff in the background. The only explanation for this would seemingly be that a meeting was held in which it was asked, “How can we get black people to listen to the ads?” The clear answer was, “black people love anything with a beat… let’s just use one, the same one even, in all of our ads!”
In fact, the mysterious R&B beat plays behind each of the South Carolina ads released so far. In a radio ad entitled “Difference,” the same beat plays behind Obama’s voice as he explains how he was the product of a single parent home, and how too many black men are in prison. Once again the image is that black people driving around town would otherwise ignore the message if not for the blaring beat in the background. Are there really black people out there going “Turn that Obama ad up son, that’s my jam!”?
More importantly, however, is the issue of when selective messages turn into stereotypes. Obama doesn’t usually mention his opinions on ‘black’ issues in his day to day stump speeches. As we all know it would likely turn off many voters who already see his ethnicity as an ‘intrusion.’ But if he rides into South Carolina with smooth beats, tales of single parent mothers and prison, and who knows, 22 inch chrome rims are likely on the list next, isn’t it a bit demeaning?
-
01.10.08 / 6:02am
I don’t think that it is demeaning. I politician has to cater to his audience. Just like a republican candidate gearing his message of agriculture reform in the Midwest and emphasizing tax cuts for the rich at a swank party, Obama addresses his audience. It is the “rhetorical situation.” Stereotypes can be really unfortunate, especially when they are limiting. But stereotypes do come from somewhere. I know before I went vegetarian, I loved my Fried Chicken and when a fresh crop of in-season watermelon comes out, it’s a family event. So when is it a “stereotype” and when is it more or less a prevalent occurrence in a cultural group that you have to account for?. Obama is smart for speaking in the “language” of who he is addressing. I prefer the slick rhythm and blues vibe. It says that he cares enough about my vote to cater to me.
-
01.11.08 / 7:26am
@ Wendell:
“But stereotypes do come from somewhere.”
Come on. Really? Stereotypes are inherently limiting; they *always* take away the full humanity of the group being stereotype. Their only purpose is to justify treating or dealing with members of Stereotyped Group X in a certain way. We shouldn’t be riding for them because they make us comfortable in some instances.
@Lerone: That said, this conversation overlaps a little with the brouhaha surrounding Bob Garfield’s column in Ad Age about ‘acceptable blackness’. Obama has run a campaign that has actively avoided nakedly racial appeals, and now he has to target S.C.’s large black electorate without calling on them by name. Look for some fake, Clinton-style blaccent over the coming few days.
-
01.11.08 / 12:13pm
I don’t think it’s demeaning either. In order to reach your audience, you have to let them know you have something in common with them. Because Barack went to Harvard doesn’t mean he wasn’t raised in a single parent home with the help of his grandparents. If he seems “broader” than some people, it’s because he is.
Don’t dislike him for his strengths.
-
01.11.08 / 11:03pm
I believe Obama is a strong candidate.
I dont believe that he is wrong for catering to issues prevalent in the black community. -
01.12.08 / 4:14pm
just leave barack alone….the man is running a race in a white world were most blacks wish they were white themselves….its ok that he appeals to whomever in his ads…he has too!!!
-
01.17.08 / 4:31am
Um … I’m not American, so perhaps I’m not one to speak, but I also don’t really think it’s demeaning. In fact, I quite liked the mellow sounds!
At the risk of sounding ignorant, I don’t know much about this campaign, other than Obama being of mixed-race and that there was a furore over his winning.
He looks like an interesting candidate to me, even though I’ve heard people worry he is too conservative.
-
01.17.08 / 4:32am
Uneek, that’s a very well observed point you raise there!
-
02.27.08 / 10:12pm
yeah, it’s ok if obama does it.






8 Comments
Jump to comment form | comments rss [?]